Template:Academic peer reviewed/doc: Difference between revisions
*>Evolution and evolvability (see also) |
m (1 revision imported) |
Latest revision as of 09:11, 15 May 2018
This is a documentation subpage for Template:Academic peer reviewed. It contains usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page. |
Usage
This template is to be used in the Reference section of articles that have been though academic peer review and published in whole or in part in an academic journal. It also adds the article to Category:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature.
{{Academic peer reviewed | journal = name of journal (can include wikilink) | doi = doi number | link = full url link to publication (if doi or pmid not used) | review = full url link to public peer review (if applicable) | title = | vauthors = | authors = | date = | volume = | issue = | pages = | pmid = | pmc = }}
Example
{{Academic peer reviewed |journal = [[Open Medicine (John Willinsky journal)|Open Medicine]] |pmid = 25426178 |review = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dengue_fever/Archive_1#Formal_peer_review_by_Open_Medicine | title = Dengue fever: A Wikipedia clinical review | vauthors = Heilman JM, De Wolff J, Beards GM, Basden BJ | date = 2014 | volume = 8 | issue = 4 | pages = 105–115 | doi = | pmc = 4242787 }}
- Produces
The 2014 version of this article has passed academic peer review (here), has been published in Open Medicine and can be cited as: Heilman JM, De Wolff J, Beards GM, Basden BJ (2014). "Dengue fever: A Wikipedia clinical review". Open Medicine. 8 (4): 105–115. PMC 4242787 . PMID 25426178. |
See also
- Category:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature - a list of all academically peer reviewed articles
{{External peer review}}
- a similar template for articles reviewed externally but not full academic peer review{{Template:Academic-written review}}
- a similar template for articles that were academic peer reviewed alongside an accompanying scholarly article